Vegans of Color

Because we don’t have the luxury of being single-issue

Pragmatic? January 23, 2010

Filed under: Uncategorized — Royce @ 2:56 pm
Tags: , , , ,

Newkirk published a defense of Peta in the Guardian on Thursday.

Her defense is of two different arguments used against Peta: 1) Their use of what Newkirk calls gradualism, and 2) Their offensive ads.


A few outspoken critics of such “half measures” or “baby steps” have gone so far as to argue against Peta’s campaigns for improved slaughter practices for chickens, better living conditions for hens and larger cages for animals in laboratories. We find this attitude unhelpful to the goal of animal liberation.

Not only is it possible to work for an end to animal slavery while simultaneously supporting incremental change, moving the bar closer to that goal also seems to us to be an important step. Yes, it is more comfortable for industry and consumers alike, but short of a bloody revolution of the sort history has witnessed in other social movements, it is also nearly impossible to move a society forward in any other way. The vast majority of people, if they care about animals − and consumer surveys show that they do − support incremental improvements, even if the increments are far from wholly satisfactory to the animals, who would rather not be caged and mutilated, hung upside down and killed, and to the liberationists, who chafe at such slow progress. It seems obvious that society is more likely to progress in a way that causes particularly abusive systems to be improved or eliminated before full animal liberation is achieved.

It is difficult to fight for animal liberation, and know that one can not do something about all the animals in cages right this second. That said it is important to question how making slaughter morally easier will benefit other animals in the long-term. Newkirk says that most consumers are in support of small incremental changes. The reason is most likely because they don’t feel as guilty consuming animals knowing that these animals had bigger cages. I’m sure if one could somehow objectively measure the happiness of chickens those in bigger cages might measure some greater level. Doesn’t mean they are happy though.

I question how self-evident it is that slow progress will eventually lead to liberation. History seems to show that liberation comes in moments of overturning paradigms, not slow edits.

Why is it so evident to Peta that bigger cages will lead to liberation?


As for the sexy women in our ads, the silly costumes, the street tableaux and the tofu sandwich give-aways, in a world where people want to smile, can’t resist looking at an attractive image and are up for a free meal, if such harmless antics will allow one individual to reconsider their own role in exploiting animals, how can it be faulted?

Notice how Newkirk posits Peta’s actions as fun, light, and okay because they cause some people to reconsider animal exploitation. Let’s ignore the border fence, the KKK actions, the objectified bodies of women (because they are sexy?), the inappropriate invocations of slavery and the Holocaust because it’s all fun! And it saves animals!

Too many lives depend on that success for us to be worried about how grand and perfect we are on the way to saving them.

And that is where Peta fails. They don’t care when their actions reinforce oppressive systems, they don’t care when their actions cause those of us who don’t agree with those oppressive systems to turn away from campaigns, or even caring about animals.

Peta doesn’t view it as pragmatic to care.


6 Responses to “Pragmatic?”

  1. Anon2 Says:

    Is it up to PETA to poll vegans or ask other groups for input on their campaigns?

    As an aside, I do not spend anytime defending PETA to people that bring them up.

  2. […] defending Peta against claims of the organization not being radical enough and being sexist. Royce and Francione have responses […]

  3. supernovadiva Says:

    the most recent offensive ad of theirs that comes to my mind is the one they did over the holidays. they didn’t take into account how they would offend christians and the vegans that follow the faith. i’m not religious and i found it offensive on various levels.

    anon2, i think it would be great to poll vegans on their ads SINCE they are always asking for donations. maybe if they listened to various vegans, not just those who work in the headquaters, their campaigns would be more effective.

  4. […] Pragmatic? | Vegans of Color "[T]hat is where Peta fails. They don’t care when their actions reinforce oppressive systems, they don’t care when their actions cause those of us who don’t agree with those oppressive systems to turn away from campaigns, or even caring about animals. Peta doesn’t view it as pragmatic to care." (tags: animalrights humanrights racism sexism discrimination) […]

  5. cheyenne Says:

    I’m not even sure why there’s so much attention on what is obviously a horrendously problematic group, like we haven’t noticed these things or like they don’t offend everyone.

  6. j Says:

    I don’t think I’d ever heard Newkirk respond to criticism of PETA’s campaigns before. This is interesting to me because a few years ago I very much supported PETA and had virtually no understanding of systematic human and non-human oppression, and would have been totally in support of her statements like they were ‘obvious’. I remember the turning point for me, someone (a Vegan of Color who should never have had to do this) explaining the problem with a specific PETA ad (and me arrogantly arguing with them and deciding “Well…I’ll think about it.” …oi) I keep thinking that other oppressors should take responsibility to explain oppression to Newkirk, but I assume many have tried…I guess it amazes me how people can refuse to hear what someone’s saying if it serves their purposes…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s